Opened 18 years ago
Last modified 16 years ago
#143 closed task
CLFS 1.1.0 Status — at Version 8
| Reported by: | Joe Ciccone | Owned by: | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | major | Milestone: | CLFS Standard 1.1.0 |
| Component: | BOOK | Version: | CLFS Standard 1.1.0 |
| Keywords: | Cc: |
Description (last modified by )
| Architecture | Builds | Testsuites | Other Tickets |
| i486 | Needs to be Checked | ||
| i586 | Yes | Needs to be Checked | |
| i686 | Yes | Needs to be Checked | |
| x86_64 | Yes | Needs to be Checked | |
| x86_64-64 | Needs to be Checked | ||
| Alpha | Yes | Needs to be Checked | #139 |
| Sparc | Needs to be Checked | ||
| Sparc64 | Yes | Needs to be Checked | #144 |
| Sparc64-64 | Needs to be Checked | #144 | |
| Mips (Little Endian) | Needs to be Checked | ||
| Mips64 (Little Endian) | Needs to be Checked | ||
| Mips64-64 (Little Endian) | Needs to be Checked | ||
| Mips (Big Endian) | Needs to be Checked | ||
| Mips64 (Big Endian) | Needs to be Checked | ||
| Mips64-64 (Big Endian) | Needs to be Checked | ||
| PPC | Yes | See comment by ken | |
| PPC64 | Yes | See comment by ken |
Tickets that effect the entire book: #146
Change History (8)
comment:1 by , 18 years ago
| Description: | modified (diff) |
|---|
comment:2 by , 18 years ago
| Description: | modified (diff) |
|---|
comment:3 by , 18 years ago
| Description: | modified (diff) |
|---|
comment:4 by , 18 years ago
comment:5 by , 18 years ago
| Description: | modified (diff) |
|---|
follow-up: 7 comment:6 by , 18 years ago
| Description: | modified (diff) |
|---|
The following (only) fail on powerpc ('ppc'): automake-1.10.1
FAIL: instsh2.test
That is the one that I assume is fixed by the patch in LFS, caused by running as root.
flex-2.5.34
Test test-c++-multiple-scanners FAILED. Test test-pthread FAILED.
expected. Actually, I'm surprised to get any output, I think the poor formatting of the results confused me in my LFS results.
gcc-4.2.2
FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/loop-19.c scan-tree-dump-times MEM.(base: &|symbol: )a, 2
FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/loop-19.c scan-tree-dump-times MEM.(base: &|symbol: )c, 2
FAIL: g++.dg/other/unused1.C scan-assembler (string|ascii?)z?\t"class2("|\\\\000)
my previous build (end of December) failed horrendously here, I now think that my personal script didn't get on with util-linux-ng (specifically /dev/pts appeared not to be mounted, although /dev was bound - now fixed by a further bind mount, maybe the text after spawn ls is misplaced in both LFS and clfs and should be in gcc ? dunno.)
glibc-2.7 failed unexpectedly for
math/test-ldouble.out
math/test-ildoubl.out
crypt/sha512c-test.out
elf/check-localplt.out
}}
grep-2.5.3
{{{
FAIL: foad1.sh
FAIL: fmbtest.sh
FAIL: yesno.sh
}}}
this is normal
texinfo-4.11
{{{
FAIL: dvipdf.test
FAIL: texi2dvi.test
}}}
These two tests fail in the absence of a working tex
vim-7.1
{{{
test3 FAILED
}}}
This always fails for me, I've no idea what it is doing, so YMMV.
Other comments: I didn't notice when e2fsprogs stopped failing on ppc - maybe 1.40.4 is the first version. I've seen a report (on lfs-dev) that 1.40.6 causes problems for grub, but both yaboot and lilo seem ok with all versions.
comment:7 by , 18 years ago
Replying to ken:
The following (only) fail on powerpc ('ppc'): flex-2.5.34
Noticed the book has moved on to 2.5.35. A quick run of the testsuite for that shows all the tests (46) succeeded.
Perhaps I ought to mention that the build used the chroot method, but with true cross-compilation on i686.
comment:8 by , 18 years ago
| Description: | modified (diff) |
|---|
Belatedly, the ppc64 test results (the build itself was started on an i686, then chrooted; the finished desktop shows no issues).
Following showed failures:
automake-1.10.1 - instsh2.test, as I expect
binutils-2.18 - within ld, 10 instances of
ERROR: /building/binutils-2.18/ld/testsuite/ld-elfvsb/sh2.c: compilation failed
- these are then reported as 20 unresolved testcases
flex : I was using a version of the book from before 2.5.35 went in.
3 failures, the 'new' one was test-alloc-extra.
I've now built and tested 2.5.35, that passes all its testsuite.
gcc-4.2.2 (all messages, including XPASSes)
g++
FAIL: g++.dg/other/unused1.C scan-assembler(string|ascii?)z?\\t"class2("|\\\\\\\\000)
gcc
UNRESOLVED: gcc.c-torture/execute/mayalias-2.c execution, -O3 -g
FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/loop-19.c scan-tree-dump-times MEM.(base: &|symbol: )a, 2
FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/loop-19.c scan-tree-dump-times MEM.(base: &|symbol: )c, 2
XPASS: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/sra-2.c scan-tree-dump-times link_error 0
FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/ppc-negeq0-1.c scan-assembler-not cntlzw
(libgomp ok)
libmudflap
FAIL: libmudflap.c/fail27-frag.c output pattern test
FAIL: libmudflap.c/fail27-frag.c (-static) output pattern test
FAIL: libmudflap.c/fail27-frag.c (-O2) output pattern test
FAIL: libmudflap.c/fail27-frag.c (-O3) output pattern test
libstdc++
XPASS: 27_io/fpos/14320-1.cc execution test
glibc-2.7 32-bit had 5 unexpected failures
math/test-ldouble.out
math/test-ildoubl.out
resolv/tst-leaks.out
elf/check-textrel.out
elf/check-localplt.out
I had to rerun that after the original build, because a fubar in my
scripts gave me an empty file. So, I got to see the .out files:
testing long double (without inline functions)
Failure: Test: signgam for lgamma(-0) == -1
Result:
is: 1
should be: -1
Test suite completed:
4128 test cases plus 3367 tests for exception flags executed.
1 errors occurred.
testing long double (inline functions)
Failure: Test: signgam for lgamma(-0) == -1
Result:
is: 1
should be: -1
Test suite completed:
4066 test cases plus 3305 tests for exception flags executed.
1 errors occurred.
resolv/tst-leaks.out was empty
elf/check-textrel.out complains about 265 libraries which have a
segment that is executable and writable - I think that test doesn't
get run on regular ppc, because it cannot pass in the 32-bit ABI,
but now we are on ppc64 so it is 'expected' to pass (for the 64-bit
ABI, of course).
elf/checklocalplt.out is a diff:
--- ../scripts/data/localplt-powerpc-linux-gnu.data 2007-08-07 06:36:08.000000000 +0100
+++ - 2008-03-13 20:27:45.775545000 +0000
@@ -1,7 +1,23 @@
libc.so: _Unwind_Find_FDE
+libc.so: __signbitl
libc.so: calloc
libc.so: free
libc.so: malloc
libc.so: memalign
libc.so: realloc
+libm.so: __fe_nomask_env
+libm.so: __signbitl
+libm.so: cosl
+libm.so: fegetexcept
+libm.so: fetestexcept
+libm.so: finitel
+libm.so: frexpl
+libm.so: ilogbl
+libm.so: ldexpl
+libm.so: logl
+libm.so: lroundl
libm.so: matherr
+libm.so: nextafter
+libm.so: roundl
+libm.so: sinl
+libm.so: sqrtl
Most of that means nothing to me.
glibc-2.7 64-bit 3 failures (test-ldoubl, test-ildoubl, checklocalplt)
grep-2.5.3 the 3 usual failures in foad1.sh, fmbtest.sh, yesno.sh
texinfo-4.11 the 2 failures I expect (dvipdf.test, texi2dvi.test)
vim-7.1 has the usual, impenetrable, test3 FAILED

How do you want to detail the testsuites ? Based on current LFS, I expect a failure in one of the autofoo packages, for which they have a patch, 2 in grep (the headline number of failures can be treated as "expected" since the book doesn't support UTF-8), and 2 in texinfo (two of the tests fail if you don't have a working tex, two more skip). Maybe there are other minor failures too, and probably failures in the toolchain tests.